WhichBot / Compare / Jaibot vs TyBOT 3.0
Head to head · updated 2026-10-09

Jaibot vs TyBOT 3.0: which robot wins?

Hilti's Jaibot against Advanced Construction Robotics's TyBOT 3.0 — price, capability, availability, and a verdict you can act on.

JaibotTyBOT 3.0
EST. PRICEQuote / lease$425,000
TASKOverhead drilling for MEP installsTies rebar intersections autonomously
SPEEDWeeks of ceiling work, days not weeks67 in standard, 117 in fully configured
PLATFORMTracked mobile base, BIM-guidedBridge decks and flat mat slabs
SENSINGTotal-station positioning + dust control2017
CREW1 operator, usable by non-specialists1 operator
AVAILABILITYLease / fleetPurchase, RaaS or rental
WHICHBOT SCORE8.3 / 108 / 10
OUR TAKEThe veteran of construction robotics. Reads the BIM model, drives itself to position, and drills perfect overhead anchor holes - dust-controlled - all shift long.The rebar robot. Traverses a bridge deck or mat slab and ties intersections continuously, on the one task in concrete work where the manual tying rate sets the schedule.

* Prices are estimates from public statements and filings. Availability changes weekly.

Detailed comparison: Jaibot vs TyBOT 3.0

Jaibot scores 8.3/10 in our independent evaluation; TyBOT 3.0 scores 8/10. That 0.3-point gap reflects real differences in capability or value, but TyBOT 3.0 may still win if its strengths match your priorities.

Jaibot is best for: MEP and general contractors on data centers, hospitals, hotels - any project with thousands of repetitive ceiling anchors. TyBOT 3.0 is best for: Bridge and heavy-civil contractors with large flat decks and enough repeat pours to keep a machine of this size working.

Our scoring weighs five factors: autonomous capability, independent verification (third-party evidence scores higher than manufacturer claims), commercial deployment scale, price-to-capability ratio, and real-world availability today. Neither robot here is scored on marketing alone. Jaibot and TyBOT 3.0 are both worth evaluating — the right call depends on which robot's documented strengths match your actual workflow.

WHICHBOT VERDICT
These machines usually solve different problems — Jaibot takes our scoring (8.3 vs 8), but the real question is which job is bleeding money on your project. MEP and general contractors on data centers, hospitals, hotels - any project with thousands of repetitive ceiling anchors. Meanwhile, TyBOT 3.0 is the answer if your bottleneck is different: bridge and heavy-civil contractors with large flat decks and enough repeat pours to keep a machine of this size working.

CHOOSE THE JAIBOT IF…

  • MEP and general contractors on data centers, hospitals, hotels - any project with thousands of repetitive ceiling anchors.
  • Most proven track record in the category (since 2020)
  • Drills straight from BIM data - fewer errors, auto-documentation

CHOOSE THE TYBOT 3.0 IF…

  • Bridge and heavy-civil contractors with large flat decks and enough repeat pours to keep a machine of this size working.
  • On jobsites since 2017, longer than almost any construction robot
  • One of very few construction robots with a published purchase price

Frequently asked

Which is better, the Jaibot or the TyBOT 3.0?
It depends on your goal. MEP and general contractors on data centers, hospitals, hotels - any project with thousands of repetitive ceiling anchors. By contrast: Bridge and heavy-civil contractors with large flat decks and enough repeat pours to keep a machine of this size working. Our scores: Jaibot 8.3/10, TyBOT 3.0 8/10.
How do the prices compare: Jaibot vs TyBOT 3.0?
Jaibot: Quote / lease. TyBOT 3.0: $425,000. Figures compiled from public sources as of July 2026; service and lease pricing is quoted per project.
Can I get either of them today?
Jaibot: Lease / fleet — In field use since 2020 with major contractors worldwide (Skanska, Bouygues and others) - arguably the most proven construction robot on the market. TyBOT 3.0: Purchase, RaaS or rental — First used on a jobsite in 2017 and offered for direct purchase since September 2024, alongside the robots-as-a-service model it started with and continuing rentals. Scope is the constraint rather than the technology: it ties flat horizontal mats and bridge decks only.

Full reviews

More matchups

Explore: The Robot Database Robot Waitlist Tracker Best Robots 2026 Robot Match Quiz